Wednesday 20 November 2013

'We've been taught a lesson' - Sammy

Darren Sammy was out for a two-ball duck, India v West Indies, 2nd Test, Mumbai, 1st day, November 14, 2013Darren Sammy has admitted that West Indies were exposed completely by the 2-0 defeat against India after three-day defeats in both Kolkata and Mumbai. Sammy admitted West Indies learned a "lesson" but said that his team was better than the result would indicate.
"Yes, it's very disappointing. We never turned up in the series," Sammy said. "We left the Caribbean at the back of six Test victories, against Bangladesh, New Zealand and Zimbabwe. Coming here really taught us a lesson, exposed us, taught us how far we are behind the top four teams in the world. We've just not turned up."
Sammy said West Indies were aware about how cricket would be secondary in the series that was Sachin Tendulkar's farewell to cricket. But in the end they ended being too benevolent to India, Sammy felt.
"I was speaking to a good friend of mine and he summed it up very well. He said we knew you were coming here to a celebration, and (hope) you got a lot of gifts. That's what we did. Rohit making his debut Test series, gifts - two hundreds. Mohammed Shami making his debut, gifts - lots of wickets. We just didn't turn up.
"And I personally have been very disappointed, not just for me but for the team as well. It's a good lesson for us, as we head down to New Zealand, for our next Test series, we've got to bounce back and come back strongly," he said.
However much honest Sammy can be, West Indies have a lot of areas to improve on. The maximum West Indies lasted across their four innings was 78 overs; In their second innings in Mumbai they failed to last even 50 overs. Only Marlon Samuels and Denesh Ramdin managed to hit half-centuries. Kemar Roach's shoulder injury at the outset of the series exposed the bowling completely as Tino Best, despite his honest toil, remained inconsistent and Rohit Sharma extracted maximum advantage of the Barbadian's wayward bowling by picking easy runs.
The only bright spark was offspinner Shane Shillingford, who finished as joint second-highest wicket-taker (11) in the series. Unfortunately for him, he did not have any partner who could multiply the pressure he was trying to create and that allowed India an easy escape route many times.
"We won six Test matches against teams we were ranked higher than," Sammy said. "Now we play against team that are ranked higher than us, it was an opportunity to showcase what we have. What we displayed over the last two Test matches, or over six days, we're much better than that. If you look at the way we played, every time we've been under pressure, we've not responded well."
In his post-mortem of the defeat in Kolkata, Sammy had pointed West Indies were defeated in the mind. Today he once again cited the same reason. "I guess it's is a mental thing. Myself as captain has not led from the front at all in this series. We deserve all the criticism that and the comments that have been thrown at us," Sammy said.

'This was the right time to stop'

Sachin Tendulkar was all smiles in his first press conference since retirement, Mumbai, November 17, 2013
You have played international cricket for 24 years. Does it feel like a dream?
To have played cricket for the country was the most important thing for me. In those 24 years, different challenges presented themselves, but the desire to play for the country was so intense that solutions presented themselves too. In finding those solutions, the family was a big help, coaches, friends, players, they were all with me. This was a dream journey. Last night when I sat alone - until know, I don't know why it has not sunk in that I am not going to play more cricket. Somewhere or the other I will go and play. I think to talk about the 24 years, I can say in short that it has been a dream journey, and I have no regrets leaving. I felt this was the right time. It was a very enjoyable journey.
But the fans don't want you to end this journey. And where does this journey take you from here?
Cricket has been my life. As I said in an interview earlier, cricket is my oxygen. Out of 40 years of my life, almost 30 years have gone playing proper cricket. That's 75% of my life. I will be associated with cricket at some level. Maybe not in the immediate future. I have played cricket for 24 years, it has been only 24 hours since retirement, and I think I should get at least 24 days to relax before deciding these things.
How did you make the decision? We definitely didn't feel you had stopped enjoying the game.
I was enjoying no doubt. Honestly, I have always maintained that the day I get the feeling I should stop, I will tell you. I remember the retirement talk has been going on for years, my answer was the same. You have to appreciate that there were many injuries during the 24 years. It wasn't easy to overcome it. At some point in your life, your body gives you the message, "Enough. Enough of this physical load." The body requires rest. I thought the body is refusing to take that load consistently. If I have to train, it was becoming an effort. Earlier training sessions used to happen by themselves. Nowadays sometimes I even felt that I should just sit and watch TV. That's when question marks arise. So when I tried to look for answers to those questions, I found out this was the perfect time to leave the game.
After that I requested the BCCI that these two matches be my last. And if possible, hold the last match in Mumbai. Because until this Test my mother had never seen me face a single ball. My mother never told me she wanted to come to the match. I wanted it to be a surprise for her, but thanks to you all she came to know. This match became really really special.
You have always said, "I am Sachin. I play for India."
Even though physically I am not playing for India, in my heart I will always be playing for India and praying for India's victory. Whether I am a part of the team, it really doesn't matter. India always comes first, and then the rest.
After Bharat Ratna, how does Sir Sachin Tendulkar sound?
Well, sar to abhi jagah pe hai [the head is still in its place]. We'll see the rest later.
Is Bharat Ratna the best award you have got from the nation?
It was really, really important. Yesterday I said this award is for my mother. For all the sacrifices she has made, right from my birth. When you are a child, it is difficult to understand life. You don't realise what your parents have to go through to make you happy. They have sacrificed everything. The beauty about it is, till this day I was never told that we did this for you, when you grow up, you realise all things. That's the reason this award is for my mother. I would like to go a step forward. Not just my mother, but like my mother there are millions and millions of other mothers that make sacrifices for their children. I am humbled and honoured that this award has been bestowed upon me.
This is for my contribution to cricket. When you are growing up, all you want to do is, go out and do your best, score hundreds, get wickets, take catches, get run-outs, win matches, and keep getting better. I have tried to do just that. While doing that, people have appreciated my performance. The way the people have responded has given me the strength to go out and repeat the performance. The award belongs to the entire nation, I would say. Truly honoured. Also at this stage, I would like to congratulate Professor CNR Rao for receiving the Bharat Ratna. It's a great honour for me to be named alongside Dr Rao. His contribution to the field of science is immense. It's just that cricket is played in front of thousands and thousands in a stadium, and whatever he has done has not happened in front of thousands. His contribution has been immense.
Was it a dampener that your final series came against a weak team?
Please understand that West Indies have world-class players. This sport is a great leveller. There are ups and downs. There have been a few occasions when we haven't fared well. We have been in that boat to know how it feels. There are certain times when things don't work out. I would say it was just one of those things when things didn't work out for them. They are a terrific side, and play in the right spirit. As long as you turn up to give your best and play cricket in the way it is meant to be played, according to me they scored full marks for them.
Any academy in the pipeline to bring up more Sachins?
It's a nice thought. I will definitely be involved with cricket. Even before I retired, I spent time with youngsters from under-19 teams and Ranji teams. Just that I haven't made those interactions public. I like interacting with players. It's nice to share your knowledge, and understand their problems. It teaches you more about the game. I have thoroughly enjoyed those interactions. I will continue to do so. They may not be done publicly, they may be done quietly and in a low-profile way, but I would like to help the youngsters, the next generations. Just share my thoughts, and be involved with cricket.
You went back to the pitch yesterday. Can you talk about that?
I knew that never ever in my life I would get to do that in an international match. That is where it all started. Those 22 yards have given me everything in my life. Whatever I have today is because I spent time within those 22 yards. It's like a temple for me. I just wanted to say a big thank you to cricket. Every time I go to bat, I touch the wicket and take blessings. That's what I did yesterday. I didn't say publicly. I just thanked cricket for everything I got in my life. It was as simple as that. Nothing complicated.
It was a very emotional moment. I remember when I made the decision to retire, I don't think I was this emotional because I knew this was the right decision. I grew emotional when the players gave me the send-off, and when I was talking to the wicket. Whenever I see that particular moment on TV, I become emotional. Otherwise I knew this was the right decision. Just the thought that I would never be able to go there to represent India, I became emotional about that.
Did your coach say well done finally?
I have reached this level because of Sir [Ramakant Achrekar], and he and my brother Ajit have been a team - on and off the field… Off the field at home… Sir has been the reason I got this far, Sir and other coaches. Sir had told me he didn't want it to go to my head and become complacent, and never said, "well played." That was why I jokingly said in the speech that he could take the chance and say "well played" as I didn't have to play anymore competitive cricket. When I got the Bharat Ratna, Sir called me, and finally said, "Well done." That gave me immense joy.
How difficult was it to work with the injuries?
During the injuries, it was very difficult. All the injuries to me were uncommon. To overcome them and play back wasn't that easy. Every time there were different goals. You sometimes had only two months to come back fit in, so do whatever you can do in those two months. But it wasn't like I could work harder and harder and shorten the recovery time from three months to two months. Nature plays a big part in recovery. You have to respect nature.
For example, after the tennis elbow, it took me four-and-a-half months after the surgery. The doctor had told me it would take that much time, but I tried to start earlier, and couldn't do it. The challenges were immense. At times it felt it was all over, and I won't be able to lift a bat again. After the tennis-elbow surgery, I couldn't even lift Arjun's plastic bat. When I went to practice for the first time after that surgery, the kids were fielding my powerful hits at 10-15 yards. I felt then that I won't be able to play anymore. That pressure is entirely different. It was a difficult phase. I want to thank the people who helped me during that time.

Sachin Tendulkar pays his respects to the Wankhede pitch, India v West Indies, 2nd Test, Mumbai, 3rd day, November 16, 2013
'Whatever I have today is because I spent time within those 22 yards. It's like a temple for me. I just wanted to say a big thank you to cricket' © BCCI 
You relationship with Ajit Tendulkar was very important.
It was a dream relationship. When I represented the country, at the same time I represented Ajit. I can't express in words what he has done for me. When I met him yesterday, he didn't show the emotions, but I could see he was relieved and relaxed. The response of the people, the love they showed you, you can't plan for that. God decided these things, and I am grateful to God for having given me a day like yesterday. I think Ajit would have felt the same. We didn't say much afterwards, but I got the sense that he too was relieved that the day had gone well and thanked God.
What was the feeling when you woke up this morning?
I woke up at 6.50 in the morning. I go according to my body clock. Yesterday too I woke up at 6.50 in the morning. When I woke up, I suddenly realised that I don't need to have a quick shower and get ready for the match. I made myself a cup of tea, and enjoyed a nice breakfast with my wife. It was a relaxed morning.
I spent a lot of time responding to the wishes that a lot of people had sent. Thanking them for all the support and all the good wishes. The morning was pretty much relaxed. I am here in front of you.
How difficult has it been? Has it sunk in yet?
When I went to the wicket, and I stood there, I realised this is the last time I am standing in front of a packed stadium actually as a part of the Indian team. This would never happen. That was very emotional. I couldn't control my tears. Knowing that I would never have a cricket bat in my hand playing for India was very very emotional. There have been wonderful moments, and I could think of all those things. It happened very fast.
You would have noticed, I didn't want to be rude, but I could not look up when I was shaking hands, including with West Indies players, because I was in tears, and I didn't want anyone to see my face that way. It's hard to express what I felt, but in spite of all these things I knew the decision was correct. I know the decision is right.
How did your parents react to your cricket?
The beauty about my family is, they never lost balance. Whether I lost a hundred or 15-20, it didn't matter. I was able to perform well since my school days because the balance was maintained at home. Nobody got carried away with my good performances and celebrated those occasions endlessly. Like any other Indian family, we used to buy a packet of sweets and offer those sweets to the Almighty, thanking the Almighty for everything that had happened in my life. That process continued. Even yesterday my mother told me she had kept sweets in front of God. That continues. It will never stop. It is something I have learnt over the years from my parents. Their reaction to me when I got back from any tour was never related to the way I performed. It was more about parents and their child.
Are you happy with your last innings, and what was your mother's reaction?
My mother was extremely happy. Earlier I was not sure whether she would come or not because it's a little difficult for her to travel. That was the only reason I requested that this match be played in Mumbai. After the first day itself, I was worried that she might not be able to sit there for long. For safety I had also told MCA to keep a room for my mother at the Garware guesthouse. But my mother preferred to sit and watch each and every ball. It is special and when I went to meet her in the president's box, I could see in her eyes what it meant. We are not people who get carried away and respond differently. It was a very controlled and balanced reaction. But she spoke to me more through her eyes than her words.
What would you want Arjun Tendulkar to do in cricket?
See, as a father I will say leave alone Arjun Tendulkar. I will say let him enjoy the cricket, and don't burden him with expectations, like his father had performed like this and he should also perform like that. If I had such pressure on me, then I would have a pen in my hand because my father was a professor, and he was in literature field. That time nobody has questioned my father as why your son has a cricket bat in his hand, and why not a pen? So, Arjun has opted for cricket bat in his hand, and he's passionate about cricket. I will say that you need to be madly in love with cricket to bring the best, and he's madly in love with cricket. That's what matters. I don't want to put pressure on him whether he performs or not. You shouldn't also put pressure on him. You need to leave a young player free so that he's able to perform and enjoy cricket. That's what I expect, and what lies in future is determined by god, and not by us.
What were your best and most disappointing moments in your cricket life?
The best moment. I will say that was when we won the World Cup here two years ago. It was my dream to win the World Cup. I had to wait for 22 years, it is a long period. That God showed me that was very special. I will also say that yesterday was also a very special day for me. The way people responded to me. I don't know how to react. I would like to say big thank you to everyone. It was very very special for me to see that reaction from people. So, these two moments have been very special for me.
If you ask me about the disappointing moment, then I will say it came in the 2003 World Cup. We were playing very well in that tournament, reached the final. It has been a big disappointment for me that we couldn't cross the final hurdle despite playing well. Like any other sportsman, I was also disappointed.
How do you enjoy interacting with youngsters whom you have inspired? Any cricketer whose success you have enjoyed the most?
To answer your last question first, I enjoy everyone's success. It's about team sport, and in team sport, it doesn't matter who performs well. Out eleven players, you will not see all eleven players performing well. There will be two or three exceptional performances, and they will be supported by the rest. As long as that consistency is maintained it doesn't matter who performs.
Talking about the new generation, I thoroughly enjoyed being part of the team. I know that someone like Bhuvneshwar [Kumar] wasn't even born when I started playing for India. I have told them jokingly, wish me 'good morning, sir' when I come to the dressing room.
It has been a joy to work with them and being part of the squad because it's not about whatever I am saying is 100% correct. If you are prepared to understand what they are also telling you, then you will become a better student of the cricket. I think that process will continue till the time I stop breathing. If you are prepared to learn, you will learn, and that's what I have maintained all along. I have shared my various experiences with them, and about my batting and my observations about their batting and what should they do. It is fun to do all that, and I have always done that and that's not only because I am the senior-most player in the side. Even when I was the junior-most member in the squad I would still do that. It was about talking cricket, breathing cricket, it's all about cricket. It doesn't matter at what stage of life you are in, and I enjoyed talking cricket with various players, and it was fun.
Will you lead the campaign to include cricket in Olympics?
As I said, it's been hardly 24 hours since I retired, and you are already engaging me into various other things. Give me some time to breathe. We will talk about them in time to come.
Where do critics stand in your book?
I observe it to a certain stage about who is writing and about what subject he is writing. Opinions will be available all around the world. A stage comes when you are convinced as to which person's advice you should follow, and who are the ones who offer constructive criticism, and what is the motive behind it. I don't think I have paid much attention to it because those who were guiding me were by my side, and they didn't hold a pen for a long time. They had either a cricket bat in their hand or cricket thoughts in their mind to encourage me to perform better so that I could perform better. I was normally interacting with such people whose interest was in how I could make more runs and how I could perform better. Beyond that, I didn't think much about the critics.
What do you want to tell others who are working hard in their 40s and who think their childhood has ended because you have retired?
I have heard that the new saying is that 40s is the new 20s, so don't think you are 40. Continue to be a 20-year-old, it works better. We are all children when we play cricket and that is how it is meant to be. We need to enjoy cricket to its fullest and cricket has always brought out that child-like exuberance whenever I have been on the field and I hope that is the case with all the cricket lovers. As and when you hold a cricket bat or you bowl a few balls, you should have that energy, bubblyness has to be there, it is fun to do that.
Do you think India should continue have a foreign coach?
I don't think it is more about foreign coach. It is about who is coaching and how best can they bring the best results for India, and how consistently they can do. That is what matters. I don't think in that direction that there has to be a foreign coach or there has to be an Indian coach. To me, there should be a proper coach who understands the players. He is more like your friend. At this level, we all know how to play a cover drive. But when something goes wrong, it is not technically as such but sometimes, it is between the ears. So who can you sit with and sort that out is what eventually matters. So to me, I feel, a coach is a coach. It really doesn't matter where he comes from. As long as the relation between the coach and the player is a healthy relationship, where they are more friends and any sort of problem which a player has, he should be able to confide in this coach and also know for a fact that it would not be leaked out, which is really important because to have that confidence in your coach is so so important. It is as simple as that.

At home across the world

Sachin Tendulkar's Test stats reflect consistency over a staggeringly long period, with the highlight being his numbers outside the subcontinent
November 18, 2013

Sachin Tendulkar punches through the off side, India v West Indies, 2nd Test, Mumbai, 2nd day, November 15, 2013
Fifteen thousand nine hundred and twenty-one. That's the new benchmark for longevity, consistency and durability that all Test batsmen will be measured against, for that's the final tally of Test runs that Sachin Tendulkar has finished with, in a 24-year journey that has combined flair and natural talent with relentless hard work and single-minded focus. Without either attribute he wouldn't have been able to succeed as much, and as consistently, as he did over an incredibly long period of time.
Apart from the sheer length of his career, what stands out is his consistency, both over different phases of his career, and in different conditions against different opposition. Against no team did he average less than 42 - the lowest averages were against Pakistan (42.28) and South Africa (42.46).
Even more impressively, he averaged at least 40 in every country he played in, unlike some of the other top batsmen who've had problems in at least one country. (Brian Lara averaged less than 40 in New Zealand and India, Jacques Kallis in England and Sri Lanka, Ricky Ponting in India, Inzamam-ul-Haq in Australia and South Africa, and Rahul Dravid in South Africa and Sri Lanka.) Tendulkar's lowest average, quite surprisingly, was in Zimbabwe - 40 in seven innings; it was also the only country where he didn't score a Test century. (Click here for Tendulkar's career summary as a Test batsman.)
What also stood out was how well he did outside the subcontinent: he averaged more than 50 in Australia and England, 49.52 in New Zealand, and 46.44 in South Africa, countries where subcontinent batsmen have often struggled.
Tendulkar's consistency also shines through when his career is split into blocks of 50 Tests. The lowest he averaged in one of those four blocks was 46.91, between Tests 101 and 150, a period during which he was also beset by tennis-elbow problems. Apart from that spell, his least productive period was the last couple of years, when his average dropped to 27.52 from 15 Tests, with no hundreds in 24 innings. At the end of 2011, Tendulkar averaged 56, but because of that lean spell, he finished at 53.78 (which is still outstanding by any standards). (Click here for his cumulative career average in Tests.)
Tendulkar's Test career, in blocks of 50 Tests
 PeriodRunsAverage100s/ 50s
First 50 TestsNov 1989-Mar 1997343849.8211/ 16
51-100 TestsMar 1997-Sep 2002496765.3519/ 18
101-150 TestsOct 2002-Aug 2008347246.919/ 15
151-200 TestsAug 2008-Nov 2013404452.5112/ 19
CareerNov 1989-Nov 201315,92153.7851/ 68
His best phase
In 1992, Tendulkar scored three hundreds, and all of them were masterpieces - 148 not out in Sydney, 114 in Perth, and 111 in Johannesburg. He was ready for bigger things, but he still finished with a calendar-year average of 41.90, because in the remaining eight innings that year he totalled 46 runs - his scores in those innings read 6,17,5,0,11,1,6,0 - clearly, he needed to become more consistent.
Being a quick learner, Tendulkar grasped that lesson fast, and over the next ten-year period he was the most prolific batsman in world cricket. That was also the time when most opposition teams had a couple of world-class fast bowlers in their ranks: the overall batting average in those ten years was 29.59; in the next 11-year period it went up to 32.67.
For Tendulkar, though, that period between 1993 and 2002 was when he was head and shoulders above all other batsmen in world cricket. He averaged 62.30 from 85 Tests; the next-best, Steve Waugh, averaged 55.07. His masterpieces during that period included 122 at Edgbaston in 1996, 169 in Cape Town the following year, 113 in Wellington in 1998, 136 against Pakistan in Chennai in 1999, 116 against Australia in Melbourne later that year, and 155 in Bloemfontein in 2001. That India ended up losing all six of those matches was a reflection of the rest of the batsmen, and the Indian bowling attack, that Tendulkar had to play with and carry along. Not all his hundreds were in defeats, though: he also scored nine in wins during that period, most famously conquering Shane Warne when scoring an unbeaten 155 in the second innings in Chennai in 1998.
Highest averages in Tests between Jan 1993 and Dec 2002 (Qual: 3000 runs)
BatsmanTestsRunsAverage100s/ 50s
Sachin Tendulkar85772662.3027/ 31
Steve Waugh109776555.0725/ 33
Rahul Dravid69561453.4614/ 28
Matthew Hayden37307953.0812/ 10
Andy Flower60463052.0212/ 25
Jacques Kallis65445550.6211/ 25
Brian Lara86732850.5318/ 34
Inzamam-ul-Haq80605650.4617/ 31
Ricky Ponting63424648.8014/ 17
Mohammad Yousuf42309948.4210/ 16
Pace and bounce? No problem
What stood out, and differentiated him from other Indian batsmen during that period, was the way he performed outside the subcontinent. The period from his debut to the end of 2001 was one where he had to shoulder the bulk of the run-scoring burden on tours; the golden period for Dravid was to start from 2002. The difference between him and the other batsmen was especially glaring in Australia and South Africa, because Dravid and Sourav Ganguly did score runs in England and New Zealand. Between 1991 and 2001, Tendulkar scored six centuries in 17 Tests in Australia and South Africa; all the other Indian batsmen put together managed only eight. In fact, of the first 21 Tests Tendulkar played, only one was at home, while 16 were outside the subcontinent (including one in Zimbabwe). Tendulkar had little experience of these conditions, but he coped quite well.
The table below shows how badly the other Indian batsmen struggled in those conditions between 1991 and 2001. Mohammad Azharuddin scored only 472 runs in 21 innings despite getting two hundreds - 14 times in those 21 innings he was dismissed for 15 or fewer; Sanjay Manjrekar's highest in 16 innings on those tours was 46; Dilip Vengsarkar totalled 158 from 9 innings, while VVS Laxman scored 244 from 11, excluding that memorable 167 in Sydney. Amid such batting failures, Tendulkar was a shining exception: in four of those five series, he averaged more than 40. Overall in those 17 Tests, he scored 19% of the total runs that were scored by all the Indian batsmen.
Indian batsmen in Australia and South Africa, between 1991 and 2001
BatsmanTestsRunsAverage100s/ 50s
Sachin Tendulkar17128244.206/ 3
Mohammad Azharuddin1247222.472/ 1
Rahul Dravid847231.461/ 2
Sourav Ganguly846931.260/ 3
VVS Laxman741141.101/ 1
Kapil Dev936726.211/ 1
Ravi Shastri635935.901/ 0
Manoj Prabhakar933624.000/ 3
Sanjay Manjrekar931322.350/ 0
Pravin Amre416933.801/ 0
Dilip Vengsarkar515817.550/ 2
The table below lists his percentage contribution to the total bat runs (excluding extras) that the team scored. It's clear that from 2002 his burden was considerably reduced. During Tendulkar's revival between 2009 and 2011 the percentage contribution went up to 16.87%, but in the last two years (15 Tests) it dropped to 8.75%.
Tendulkar's contribution to the team
PeriodTendulkar's runsTeam runsPercentage
Till Dec 19921085912211.89
Jan 1993 to Dec 2001633432,04819.76
Jan '93 to Dec '01, in Aus, SA, NZ, Eng, WI1783836821.31
Jan 2002 onwards850259,86314.20
Overall15,921101,03315.76
The rock at No.4
Of the 329 innings Tendulkar played in his Test career, 275 were at the No. 4 position. For the first 22 innings of his Test career Tendulkar batted at No. 6 or 7, but the change happened after his unbeaten 148 against Australia in Sydney in 1992. In the second innings of the next Test, in Adelaide, Tendulkar moved up to No. 4 - above Vengsarkar and Azharuddin - as India looked to chase a stiff fourth-innings target of 372. He scored only 17 in that innings (Azharuddin scored a century as India lost by 38 runs), but the next game was in Perth, and Tendulkar's stunning 114 - in only his second innings at No.4 - settled matters. From the time he first batted at No. 4, only 29 times did he deviate from that position, mostly because of a nightwatchman coming in at No. 3 or 4.
At No. 4, he finished with 13,492 runs, 4574 more than the next-highest. Kallis and Greg Chappell have better averages, but it's unlikely any batsman will touch his aggregate at that position.
Highest run-getters at No.4 in Tests
BatsmanInningsRunsAverage100s/ 50s
Sachin Tendulkar27513,49254.4044/ 58
Jacques Kallis168891861.9334/ 36
Mahela Jayawardene177865652.4628/ 30
Brian Lara148753551.2524/ 31
Javed Miandad140692554.1019/ 31
Mark Waugh170666242.4316/ 39
Kevin Pietersen130619949.5919/ 25
Gundappa Viswanath124508143.0512/ 31
Inzamam-ul-Haq98486752.9015/ 21
Martin Crowe106484149.3916/ 16
Aravinda de Silva113454344.1015/ 16
Greg Chappell86431659.1215/ 19
The table below lists Tendulkar's stats at No. 4 sorted by the team scores at which he came in to bat. Like you'd expect of any batsman, he was more prolific when the top three batsmen had given the team a good start: when he came in with the score reading 100 or more for the loss of two wickets, Tendulkar averaged 70.49, and scored 21 centuries from 97 such innings.
When he came in to bat very early - before India had scored 20 - Tendulkar's average dropped to 40.53. However, some of his most memorable innings came in such situations: when he scored 122 at Edgbastonagainst England in 1996, he came in at 17 for 2, and scored 122 out of a team total of 219. (The second-highest score in the innings was 18.) His 136 against Pakistan in Chennai came from an entry score of 6 for 2, while the Boxing Day 116 started from 11 for 2.
But it's also true that he was dismissed cheaply fairly often when he came in early: of the 37 times he came in at No. 4 before the total had reached 20, 15 times he was dismissed for single-digit scores.
However, his average went up to almost 51 when he came with the score between 20 and 49. Two of his double-centuries - 248 not out against Bangladesh and 214 against Australia - came from these entry scores, as did the 155 in Bloemfontein (2001) and the 146 in Cape Town (2011).
Tendulkar at No. 4 by point-of-entry scores
ScoreInningsRunsAverage100s/ 50s
Less than 2037145940.535/ 5
21 to 4968336450.979/ 15
50-7542140940.264/ 8
76-9931140950.325/ 8
100-14950264061.399/ 9
150 and above47321180.2812/ 13
At his best against the best
One of the most impressive aspects of Tendulkar's career is his record against the best team of his generation. Towards the last few years of his career Australia were clearly not the best team around, but for nearly two decades they set the standard, and Tendulkar was pretty impressive against them in almost every series. In 39 Tests against them Tendulkar averaged 55, with 11 centuries in 74 innings. This, despite averaging only 34.21 in his last 15 innings against them. In Australia, he averaged 53.20 from 20 Tests, with six centuries. Only Jack Hobbs, who made 12 hundreds from 41 matches, has scored more centuries against Australia than Tendulkar.
Between 1990 and 2008, no batsman who played at least 20 innings against them averaged more than Tendulkar's 56.08. In 30 innings in Australia during this period, Tendulkar averaged 58.53. With a 12 innings cut-off, only Virender Sehwag (59.50) averaged more. In 35 innings that Lara played in Australia over the same period, he averaged 41.97.
Highest batting averages v Aus between 1990 and 2008 (Qual: 20 inngs)
BatsmanInningsRunsAverage100s/ 50s
Sachin Tendulkar55274856.0810/ 11
VVS Laxman44220455.106/ 10
Kevin Pietersen2096353.502/ 6
Virender Sehwag30148351.133/ 7
Brian Lara58285651.009/ 11
Ijaz Ahmed2091350.725/ 1
Richie Richardson24108449.274/ 4
Shivnarine Chanderpaul29121048.404/ 7
Michael Vaughan2095947.954/ 1
Graham Thorpe31123545.743/ 8
The fourth-innings chink
The one aspect of his Test batting which was underwhelming was his performances in the fourth innings. He still holds the record for most runs in this aspect as well, but this one is unlikely to remain with him for too long: his aggregate of 1625 is only 50 more than the second-best, and 92 more than the best among active players (Graeme Smith's 1533). Tendulkar scored only 10.2% of his total runs in the fourth innings, compared to 17% for Smith.
Tendulkar's fourth-innings average of 36.93 is disappointing too: among the 21 other batsmen who've scored 1000-plus fourth-innings runs, 18 have a better average. One of them who doesn't, though, is Brian Lara: his 1440 runs in the last innings came at an average of 35.12. And then there's also the curious case of Steve Waugh, who scored only 613 fourth-innings runs at an average of 25.54.
More Tendulkar stats
  • His career span of 24 years and a day is the fifth-longest in Test history.
  • Tendulkar's first-class tally of 50,192 ranks 16th in the all-time list. Tendulkar is the third non-England player - after Gordon Greenidge and Viv Richards - to enter the 50,000-first-class-runs club.
  • Six times Tendulkar scored 1000 or more Test runs in a calendar year, the most by any batsman.
  • Tendulkar scored 1000 or more Test runs against seven different opposition teams. Dravid is the only other batsman to achieve this feat.
  • Tendulkar is the youngest among Indian batsman to score a Test century (and the third-youngest overall). Had he scored a century in his last Test innings, he would have been the oldest Indian Test centurion as well.
  • With Dravid, Tendulkar put together 6920 partnership runs, the most by any pair. The 20 century standsbetween them is also a record.
  • In his entire Test career, Tendulkar was involved in 86 century stands, with 26 different partners. Only Dravid has more century partnerships in Tests.
  • Tendulkar was dismissed in the nineties ten times in Tests, the most for any batsman.
  • Six players won more Man-of-the-Match awards than Tendulkar. His 14, though, is the best by an Indian; Dravid's next on 11.